Use cases by need/Gain objectivity

Decide on criteria,
not on instinct.

A recruiter's instinct has its value, but it becomes impractical as soon as volumes grow: comparing ten, fifty or a hundred profiles without a structured grid is not a viable long-term strategy. Evalyo applies an auditable weighted grid, where every score traces back to concrete signals from the interview (timestamped quotes, observed behaviors).

Anaïs · Talent Manager · B2B scale-up

"Every manager has their own definition of a good candidate."

Anaïs works with 8 managers who recruit within their teams. Each has their own idea of the "good candidate": for one it's autonomy, for another technical rigor, for another culture fit. Without written weighted criteria or a shared grid, evaluations stay subjective and comparisons between candidates become impossible.

Aujourd'hui · sans Evalyo
Avant
managers recruteurs8
grille pondérée écrite0
niveau d'exigence par équipeVariable
Evalyo's answer

Weighted criteria,
a framework shared by everyone.

Anaïs co-builds the weighted criteria grid for each role with every manager: technical skills, soft skills, expected postures. The agent applies the same grid to all candidates. Each report surfaces a score per criterion, backed by concrete elements from the interview. Decision-making rests on comparable elements rather than personal impressions.

Critères pondérés par poste
Avant
0
Avec Evalyo
12+
Niveau d'exigence partagé
Avant
Non
Avec Evalyo
Oui
Comparabilité des candidats
Avant
Subjective
Avec Evalyo
Auditable
Théo · Hiring Manager · large industrial group

"My scattered notes are no substitute for real analysis."

Théo runs 5 interviews a week for his team. He takes notes during the interview, but between two days of client delivery and a steering committee, the details blur together. When it comes to comparing three finalists, he relies on his impressions rather than a structured analysis of the answers.

Aujourd'hui · sans Evalyo
Avant
entretiens / semaine5
notes manuscrites / candidat~30 min
synthèse comparable0
Evalyo's answer

A personalized report,
for every candidate.

For each candidate, Evalyo generates a structured report that summarizes the answers, scores strengths per criterion, identifies areas of doubt and suggests targeted follow-up questions for the next interview. The language model analyzes the interview verbatims and surfaces the weak signals Théo might have missed. He decides based on a comparable read, in a few minutes rather than a few hours.

Temps de synthèse par candidat
Avant
~30 min
Avec Evalyo
< 5 min
−83%
Citations à l'appui de la décision
Avant
~3
Avec Evalyo
~15
×5
Comparabilité entre candidats
Avant
Faible
Avec Evalyo
Auditable

Decide on clear criteria,
with reports to back you up.

Define your weighted grid per role, receive structured reports for each candidate and decide on concrete elements. Industry grid templates provided to set up quickly.

Decide on criteria, not on instinct.